In.media logo

News of the Day

Posted by Pramod Tummala on April 15, 2010

Mediamath Acquires Adroit, Combines DSP with Dynamic Ads

As data-driven efficiencies in online advertising advance, demand side platform Mediamath may have marked another stage in that evolution. The firm acquired dynamic ad creation company Adroit Interactive last week, combining Adroit’s tools for creative customization and segmentation of ads with its own audience targeting and buying platform. The companies have worked together since Q4 of last year, integrated their technologies, and tested that initial integration. One advertiser that matches consumers to relevant local deals used the system to target specific messages to consumers in most DMAs across the country. “Our buying platform was able to buy media across all these areas, and then the creative took over to assemble the right geographic message,” said Mediamath CEO Joe Zawadzki. Mediamath integrates with third-party data providers such as Blue Kai, and media suppliers including Yahoo’s Right Media, Microsoft’s AdECN, and Google’s DoubleClick exchanges.

Read More: ClickZ

Joost Video Network Stuns With Big Reach: 67 Million Viewers Per Month

Straight out of left field, the Joost Video Network has assumed the number 2 spot in comScore’s Video Metrix “Top 100 Properties”, second only to Google. The Joost network, which is now operated by Adconion after the company’s acquisition of the ill-fated European startup’s assets back in November 2009, claims a reach of 67 million unique viewers per month. To put that in perspective: that’s approximately 38 percent of the total US Internet population who are consuming videos each month. According to Adconion’s press release, the Joost Video Network, which consists of hundreds of major video destination sites, showed an aggregate of over 100 million videos to consumers in February. Perusing through the current selection of channels on Joost.com, I’m fairly surprised that the network is drawing so many views, as it consists mainly of niche video destinations that I would estimate only a small number of people would be interested in.

Read More: TechCrunch

Marketers Watch as Friends Interact Online

Birds of a feather flock together. Or, in the Internet age, a customer’s friend is a potential customer. Embracing those truisms, some big marketers, including Sprint and eBay, are turning to small start-ups to help them tap social-networking data to find would-be clients among the friends and acquaintances of existing customers, to the dismay of some privacy advocates. EBay, for instance, used online tracking technologies to identify customers who browsed or shopped for products in the clothing, shoes and accessories section of its site. It then turned to New York-based start-up 33Across, which analyzed data from social-networking sites to map out the connections between the customers eBay had identified and other Web surfers, in order to serve up ads at the right time and place. New York-based 33Across tracks how consumers interact with one another—commenting on posts or sharing messages, for instance—across about 20 sites, online networks and third-party application companies, which build software like games and quizzes for social-networking sites. 33Across says those sites reach a total of 100 million monthly unique U.S. visitors. For example, if an eBay customer shared a movie review with an acquaintance, 33Across identified that connection and places a cookie, or anonymous string of tracking data, on the acquaintance’s browser so that they later could be targeted with a relevant ad whenever they visit certain sites.

Advertisers say the new wave of social-networking targeting is registering impressive results. Daphne Liska, senior manager of Internet marketing at eBay, said the 33Across campaign was more successful than standard online ads and that eBay plans to continue using social data to find new customers. Sprint, which also worked with 33Across, tested the approach last summer to promote the launch of the Palm Pre smart phone and quadrupled related online sales, says Joe Migliozzi, managing director of digital at Mindshare, the WPP-owned media agency that managed a campaign for Sprint. He says Sprint is considering the same approach for future campaigns. “A lot of what goes into a purchase comes from a general conversation between you and people in your group,” Mr. Migliozzi says. “We’re identifying the links between people.” 33Across is one of a handful of start-ups, such as Media6-Degrees and Lotame, that aim to make use of the reams of Internet user data behind social-networking sites for ad targeting. They all use complex algorithms to track connections between consumers. 33Across says it tracks five billion connections, then weighs them to determine the closest ties. “There are massive streams of untapped social relationship data,” says Eric Wheeler, chief executive of 33Across. Mr. Wheeler says his company collects user data from MyYearbook.com but he declined to name other specific sites, citing agreements with those Web sites. (Tracking cookies from 33Across were found by The Wall Street Journal on other sites, including popular Twitter-photo site twitpic.com, as well as music site lyricsmode.com and health site righthealth.com.) Not surprisingly, such tracking of friends and acquaintances has attracted the attention of some lawmakers and regulators.

Such ad-targeting approaches are facing increased scrutiny from federal regulators who are investigating privacy issues tied to the Internet. Some lawmakers, concerned about Internet privacy, say they are preparing to introduce legislation in the coming weeks to make more transparent Web sites’ tactics for collecting information on their users. “To the extent that ad companies are using social-media information to deliver ads in a way that is not transparent to consumers or consumers don’t understand what the source of the basis of the ads are, that could present an issue,” says Christopher Olsen, an assistant director in the privacy and identity protection division of the Federal Trade Commission. The ad-targeting companies say that they abide by industry standards and that the information they collect is anonymous and can’t be traced back to individual users. Industry trade groups are introducing standards that let consumers know when they are being targeted by an ad as a result of tracking.

Both Facebook and MySpace allow marketers to target ads on their sites to consumers based on the information users include in their profile, such as occupation, age, location and interests. (MySpace is owned by News Corp., which also owns The Wall Street Journal.) The new group of start-ups thinks that the data mapping connections between people—rather than their profile information—are more valuable. Facebook ran into a privacy debacle in 2007 with an advertising tool called Beacon that allowed Facebook to track users’ activities on certain external sites, then show updates on the site about those activities, such as retail purchases. CEO Mark Zuckerberg later apologized to users and changed the site’s privacy settings. The new targeting technique is rooted in decades of research about social behavior. A New England Journal of Medicine study from 2008, for instance, found that smoking behavior—such as quitting or not— spreads through social ties. “These companies are on to an important factor in the market that we haven’t tapped into well, which is how consumers are connected to each other and how they influence each other’s purchases,” says Emily Riley, an analyst with Forrester Research. Still, ad executives say they are seeking more transparency about where the data come from and where their ads appear. “Agencies are still trying to wrap their heads around it,” says John Nitti, senior vice president and digital director at Publicis Groupe’s Zenithmedia.

WSJ: Full Article Here

News of the Day

Posted by Pramod Tummala on April 7, 2010

What’s the Real Deal with Real-Time Bidding?

Over the last year, the emergence of real-time biddable marketplaces for ad inventory has roiled the online media industry and revealed a potentially disruptive channel in the digital marketing landscape. As Mike Baker noted in a column on the topic, in fact, real-time biddable inventory has the potential to revolutionize the ad industry on the buy-side and sell-side alike. Those familiar with Clayton Christensen’s, “Innovator’s Dilemma,” will recognize both the threat and opportunity in this disruptive new technology. And agencies and marketers alike are retooling processes, teams, and states of mind to make sure they are not left behind. The forces reshaping the media landscape and bringing real-time bidding discussions to the forefront have little to do with “real time” anything. Currently, RTB inventory represents a small fraction of the overall media inventory traded daily across ad exchanges. The best estimates I’ve seen indicate 5 percent to 10 percent of biddable, exchange-traded media is purchased through real-time bidding today. But by all accounts exchange-traded media is working, and working well. At our agency, for example, we find exchange-traded media among our most efficient channels, often performing at comparable levels to search marketing from a direct response standpoint. So if “real-time” bidding isn’t driving this success, what is? The answer is clear: micro-segmentation and de-averaged pricing, neither of which need to be done in real time to be effective. (Here’s how de-averaged pricing works: Instead of paying a single price for one lump segment, you break the lump segment into its component parts and pay a unique price for each of those parts. This represents the “de-averaged” price.)

Read More: ClickZ

PointRoll Opens Insights To Connect Rich Media Engagement With Campaign Data

Rich media provider PointRoll on Wednesday is expected to unveil its Open Insights initiative, which aims to help marketers improve their creative campaigns. At launch, the initiative includes seventeen partners spanning audience understanding and identification, targeting, dynamic creative versioning, and reporting integrations. Open Insights works by connecting rich media engagement metrics with other campaign data to better understand the relationship between advertisers’ creative and media goals. Partners include AOL, QuadrantOne, Google Content Network, ContextWeb, and ADISN. Other real-time parameter integrations with Nielsen PRIZM and BlueKai have been put in place to increase dynamic ad generation and optimization in scale across publishers and ad networks. Of key importance, Open Insights offers a consolidated view of ad effectiveness across creative, targeting, media and delivery, according to said Max Mead, VP of business development and analytics for PointRoll. “Better data means better decisions,” said Mead. “We’ve heard from marketers that they’re looking for new ways to use data to understand and find new audiences, and to make sure they’re serving the most relevant, personalized creatives to different types of users.”

Read More: MediaPost

iPad Is The Google Killer

Forget the Kindle.  The Kindle was dead as of 9 AM April 3rd, and had been on life support for the previous six months anyway as people put off buying a Kindle until the iPad came out.  The iPad, however, is not the Kindle-killer.  At least not anymore.  The iPad is the Google killer. Now I see why Google is so focused on Android and Chrome.  Now I see why Eric Schmidt left Apple’s board. Google is afraid for the first time, and it’s not Microsoft it’s worried about.  I reached this epiphany this weekend as I spent some quality time with my new device.  Here’s how it happened. I was sitting on my couch, getting to know my iPad.  Of course, I wanted to check out some apps, to see if there were better or newer ones than the ones I had for my iPhone.  I searched through the categories – entertainment, news, navigation, etc. – chose a number of apps, opened them, and played around.  I read articles from the Wall Street Journal.  Checked the weather reports on the blustery Seattle day we were having.  And I looked at some recipes in the Epicurious app.  I played some games.  I downloaded a book and read a bit of it.  I watched some YouTube videos. And then it dawned on me.  I had just spent hours consuming content, connecting with brands I like, and discovering new and wonderful things to do with my iPad.  And I never opened my browser. I didn’t need Google. I did all of these things and never touched the web.  Never typed in search term.  Never clicked www anything.  I got a bit of a shiver.  Then I bought more Apple stock. Here are some revelations that came to me this weekend:

  • Apple has trained us to look for apps and use apps, not web sites. The iPad just furthers this behavior that Apple is training in us.  I don’t need to open a browser anymore to get to my favorite content, my social networks, my maps and weather, etc.
  • The disintermediation between Google/search and customers has been usurped (or soon will be) by Apple. Via apps, music, movies, and books, Apple now owns the customer “search” relationship.
  • The app store is a discovery tool. Search is not. Search is a research tool because it assumes I already know what I am looking for, at least in part.  This makes search useful for some things, but frustrating for others.  As users discover this, they will use search less.
  • All of this means that search will become less of a navigational tool over time. Today, search is often the first place people go on the web. In the future, that will become less necessary.  You will start with your apps.
  • Forget bringing your laptop on vacations anymore. You won’t need it.  The iPad was made for planes and for consuming on the go.
  • In fact, the PC will continue to exist, but solely as a productivity device. I think that Microsoft can actually breathe a sigh of relief because the iPad does not do away with the need for Office or Windows. It just makes the PC a more utilitarian device rather than the do-everything device it is today.

Read More: Mele’s Musings

News of the Day

Posted by Scott Berkson on March 17, 2010

Five Things Your DSP Can’t Do

Demand-side platforms (DSPs) are all the rage in online advertising today. Why? As buying and selling of online inventory moves from the relationship-driven, “three-martini-lunch” deal to a programmatic, impression-by-impression auction, advertising buyers are salivating at the opportunity to “cherry pick” the best inventory. So fire up your DSP contract, set your traders loose, and bask in the glory of online advertising victory! But hang on. The DSP promises of convenience and efficiency are certainly compelling. But the path to achieving real success in finding, engaging, converting and retaining your audiences and prospects online is much more complex than DSPs will admit.

Here are five functions a DSP cannot do for major advertisers…

Read More: MediaPost

Engagement Is Key For Rich Media Video Ads

When it comes to rich media ads on the Internet that employ video, engagement matters enormously. Environment, not so much.  
That’s the major and in some ways surprising takeaway from a new study conducted by VideoEgg and comScore. The study examined the effectiveness of rich media video ads vs. traditional banners. The goal was to prove the theory that banner ads containing video are more engaging. In addition, the study gauged whether site environment — particularly contextual relevance — played a role in how well such ads performed. Overall, video ads proved to be more engaging — and engaging ads move the sales needle better than standard ads, the study found. (It was no surprise that VideoEgg’s AdFrame units — expandable placements that take over portions of Web pages — were roughly twice as effective as standard IAB banners at driving awareness.)

Read More: AdWeek

GroupM Will Be Watching Where Its Clients’ Ads Run, And Where They Should Not

In the biggest push yet by a major Madison Avenue player to gain some control over the sometimes capricious way that their ads run online, WPP’s GroupM unit has cut deals with two of the leading online ad verification services, and will integrate their systems as part of the tool chest that WPP’s agencies use to plan, buy and post their online display ads. The deals with AdSafe and DoubleVerify follow an intensive review of the major ad verification services, which included a month-long test involving half a billion impressions of online advertising inventory. “There’s always been the issue of are we getting what we asked for,” John Montgomery, COO of GroupM Interaction, one of the largest buyers of online media, tells Online Media Daily. “Just think of the staggering number of impressions we are delivered — there is no way of knowing that we are getting what we paid for.” Montgomery, who was part of the GroupM team that rewrote WPP’s terms and conditions of online advertising buys last year to gain more accountability for its clients’ ads and media buys, said the verification systems pick up where the T&Cs left off.

Read More: MediaPost

ABOUT

in.media's core mission is to maintain a community inside digital media (in 'dot' media). We will keep you informed of the most important news stories, discuss issues and opportunities facing our industry and provide those who are working in the trenches a vehicle to voice their own opinions.

FOLLOW US

facebook twitter linkedin rss

SEARCH