<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>in.media &#187; publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indotmedia.com/tag/publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indotmedia.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:50:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-143/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-143/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple And Google Set To Capitalize (And Compete) On Internet TV
Connected TVs and set-top devices enabling consumers to view video from across the Internet on TVs could ultimately drive online video ads and marketing content budgets. The online video ad segment should grow at a 39% compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) during the next five [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Apple And Google Set To Capitalize (And Compete) On Internet TV</strong></span></p>
<p>Connected TVs and set-top devices enabling consumers to view video from across the Internet on TVs could ultimately drive online video ads and marketing content budgets. The online video ad segment should grow at a 39% compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) during the next five years, becoming a more than $5 billion market by 2014, estimates analyst firm Piper Jaffray, which released a series of reports Monday related to IPTV.</p>
<p>The slow shift of consumers spending more time with online video has already begun. The report explains some private video advertising networks admit to securing at least seven-figure budgets from major TV advertisers. Ad networks like Tremor, and those producing proprietary content like Adconion or BBE, could benefit from the transition. The bottom line, according to Piper Jaffray analysts, points to numerous Internet companies like Apple, Google and Yahoo, as well as Rovi, also capitalizing on this move.</p>
<p>Expect Google TV to comprise about 15% of the connected TVs by 2013, rising to 18% by 2014, according to Piper Jaffray. Intel&#8217;s CE4100 SoC and Google&#8217;s Android operating system is the technology platform that Sony and Logitech will build into products and release in the fall. Other set-top boxes, media players and TV makers have Google TV products slated for the first quarter in 2011.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=133875" target="_blank">MediaPost</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Agencies Divided on Where to House New Mobile Units</strong></span></p>
<p>In a matter of weeks, several new mobile units have sprouted up within adland, prompting debate in ad circles about whether the offerings should take root within creative agencies or form under media shops.</p>
<p>Omnicom Group recently launched a mobile-marketing consultancy called Airwave under media agency giant OMD. According to Jon Haber, U.S. director of OMD&#8217;s Ignition Factory, <a title="Omnicom Launches Mobile Consultancy at OMD" href="http://adage.com/agencynews/article?article_id=145082">a media shop is the intuitive place to house a mobile unit.</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Mobile is bought in many of the same ways that digital media is bought, but it stretches across coupons, CRM, texts and out of home,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It bleeds into all other media types. An agency like OMD touches other media units, so it makes sense for mobile to be in-house so it can integrate into everything from TV to digital.&#8221;</p>
<p>OMD has also dabbled in mobile creative work; in 2009, it created the Dockers shakable iPhone ad with rich media provider Medialets. While paid media was a component of the Dockers campaign, <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=135197">it also received a lot of attention for creative</a>.</p>
<p>Paid media has dominated recent buzz in mobile advertising with Apple and Google buying into the category. In January, Apple acquired mobile ad network Quattro and just recently launched its souped-up mobile ad unit, iAd, with big-budget advertisers such as Citibank and Unilever in tow. That followed Google&#8217;s $750 purchase of AdMob, which was under <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=144022">prolonged investigation by the Federal Trade Commission until just recently</a>.</p>
<p>But for a platform that also includes brand apps, partnerships with developers and location-based services, there&#8217;s much more to mobile than display.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://adage.com/agencynews/article?article_id=145401" target="_blank">AdWeek</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>AOL’s Patch Aims To Quintuple In Size By Year-End</strong></span></p>
<p><a title="Patch" href="http://patch.com/">Patch</a>, which has already established itself as the biggest network of neighborhood blogs in the country since <a title="being acquired by AOL" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-aol-buys-two-local-news-startups/">being acquired by AOL</a> last summer, plans to accelerate its growth dramatically. Patch President Warren Webster tells us the company will add a staggering 400 hyperlocal sites over the next six months, bringing its total to 500. In order to accomplish its goal, Patch will hire 500 more reporters in 20 states, making it—by far—the biggest new hirer of full-time journalists in the U.S.</p>
<p><a name="keep_reading"></a></p>
<p>AOL (<a title="AOL" href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&amp;Ticker=AOL">NYSE: AOL</a>) had <a title="already disclosed" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-aols-2009-by-the-numbers-190m-reorg-charges-sold-buy.at-for-17m-patchs-/">already disclosed</a> that it intended to invest $50 million to expand Patch this year, but the company hadn’t said exactly how it would allocate that cash. Back in April, for instance, when Patch had 46 sites in five states, Webster <a title="told us" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-interview-aol-patchs-webster-the-plan-to-produce-returns-on-that-50-mil/">told us</a> that the company expected to be “in hundreds of towns” by year-end but wouldn’t be more specific.</p>
<p>Webster says that Patch is selecting towns to expand to based in part on a 59-variable algorithm that takes into account factors like the average household income of a town, how often citizens vote, and how the local public high school ranks; the company is then talking to local residents to ensure that targeted areas have other less quantifiable characteristics like a “vibrant business community” and “walkable Main Street.” Patch hires one professional reporter to cover each community; each “cluster” of sites also has an ad manager who is the “feet in the street” selling ads.</p>
<p>The network, however, says that to date it <em>hasn’t</em> been focusing on generating revenue. “Our philosophy from day one was that the first priority should be to build an engaged audience through journalism,” Webster says. “The second phase is to leverage that audience for local businesses that want to target customers. We’re at the beginning of phase two now.” Right now, Patch is letting local businesses buy banner ads and also letting them set up their own business listings, which they can convert into ads.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-aols-patch-aims-to-quintuple-in-size-by-year-end/" target="_blank">PaidContent.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-143/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-142/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-142/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Extends TV Ad Program With DirecTV Partnership
Google has announced a partnership with DirecTV, allowing advertisers to buy national inventory on 11 networks carried by the satellite provider &#8211; including Bloomberg, Fox Business, Centric, and Fuel &#8211; through the search giant&#8217;s auction-based self-service TV ad platform.
According to Google, DirecTV is responsible for selling between two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Google Extends TV Ad Program With DirecTV Partnership</strong></span></p>
<p>Google has announced a partnership with DirecTV, allowing advertisers to buy national inventory on 11 networks carried by the satellite provider &#8211; including Bloomberg, Fox Business, Centric, and Fuel &#8211; through the search giant&#8217;s auction-based self-service TV ad platform.</p>
<p>According to Google, DirecTV is responsible for selling between two and four minutes of ads for every hour of programming it delivers, with the networks themselves selling the remainder. The arrangement will see DirecTV effectively hand off its inventory for those 11 networks to Google, which will now offer advertisers access to ads across all dayparts, including primetime.</p>
<p>Speaking with ClickZ, John Saroff, head of strategic partnerships for Google&#8217;s TV Ads product, said the intention was to help give online advertisers a taste of what TV has to offer. &#8220;Our bread and butter is bringing new advertisers to television &#8211; internet advertisers that have grown up with Google,&#8221; he said, adding that over 30 percent of advertisers currently using the product are new to TV advertising.</p>
<p>In 2007, Google agreed to a relationship with DISH Network through which it sells ads across 90 different networks. However, that relationship is non-exclusive, meaning the type and volume of inventory fluctuates, depending on negotiations with DISH.</p>
<p>DirecTV, however, has essentially agreed to subcontract all of its ad sales to Google for those 11 networks, representing a significant step forward for the fledgling product. &#8220;This is a very exciting day for us,&#8221; Saroff said, adding, &#8220;We hope to extend the relationship down the line, but it makes sense to start with a relatively small amount of inventory.&#8221;</p>
<p>Essentially, Saroff suggested the product has been pitched mainly at small to medium-sized businesses looking for an easy way to extend their marketing efforts. However, a lack of geographic targeting capabilities would appear to limit its appeal to local advertisers, as could the costs associated with producing ad creative. In 2009, an <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/1695416/google-still-slow-attract-new-advertisers-tv">agency exec told ClickZ</a> that most small businesses have little time, or the inclination to experiment with the medium, stating, &#8220;You need a professional.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/1727656/google-extends-tv-ad-program-with-directv-partnership" target="_blank">ClickZ</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Council Proposes Web Content Guidelines</strong></span></p>
<p>The Internet Content Syndication Council has released proposed guidelines for content syndication for its members&#8211; and ultimately the online media industry as a whole &#8212; to review.</p>
<p>The  group, which includes CBS, Reuters, Turner and the Associated Press, says it is making a bid to bolster Web content quality and strengthen the utility of the Internet.<br />
 <br />
The guidelines are aimed at countering the rise of shoddy, poorly sourced and edited content, often produced solely with search engines in mind. While not naming these companies directly, the ICSC’s push seems clearly aimed at companies such as Demand Media, Yahoo’s Associated Content and AOL’s Seed.com. Each churns out a large amount of enterprise or general-interest service content &#8212; mostly produced by low-paid freelancers.</p>
<p>The ICSC says the stakes are high, claiming &#8220;content mill&#8221; output is making the Web experience worse for average users. The group believes creators and publishers should work to preserve the utility of the Internet for users and advertisers alike.</p>
<p>To do so, the ICSC guidelines &#8212; geared toward informational content, not opinion or entertainment &#8212; focus on the importance of journalistic principles. For example, the guidelines encourage that formal editorial processes be used whether articles are produced by staff writers or freelancers. All work should be date stamped, and all corrections be clearly labeled. Plus, perhaps most controversially, the ICSC believes that writers&#8217; credentials should be prominently displayed alongside their work.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3ie16e8b7507e085a973c00010b53b6d67" target="_blank">AdWeek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-142/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-138/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-138/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand-side platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time Bidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Armstrong: Mission Is To Make A Sick Company Healthy
AOL (NYSE: AOL) CEO Tim Armstrong knew he would have to do a lot of investor soothing given that it posted another tough earnings report for Q2. He described the mission before him as very simple: making a sick company a healthy one. Invoking Warren Buffett’s “snowball” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Armstrong: Mission Is To Make A Sick Company Healthy</strong></span></p>
<p>AOL (<a title="AOL" href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&amp;Ticker=AOL">NYSE: AOL</a>) CEO Tim Armstrong knew he would have to do a lot of investor soothing given that it posted <a title="another tough earnings report" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-aol-swings-to-loss-ad-revenues-plunge-27-percent/">another tough earnings report</a> for Q2. He described the mission before him as very simple: making a sick company a healthy one. Invoking Warren Buffett’s “snowball” metaphor for the growth of his portfolio depending on finding a wet snowball and a steep hill to roll it down. “We’ve got a tightly packed snowball” at AOL, Armstrong said. He also described a “platform war” currently going on in Silicon Valley and how “content is the ammunition” and AOL will be a central supplier of that firepower. In explaining the dismal ad prospects, despite the recovery, Armstrong said advertisers continue to lag consumers in adopting online media.  Video is going to be a focus for AOL and Armstrong noted that there will be some branded entertainment partnerships announced shortly. StudioNow, which it bought last winter, grew 25 percent in terms of video output from the last quarter. “You will see a new home page that is targeted heavily around video this quarter,” Armstrong said.  On the local front, AOL’s hyperlocal play Patch added 39 new towns for a total of 83 localities in its network.  “Nobody likes to show up to these calls and report down numbers,” but Armstrong wanted investors to known that he has his own money tied up in AOL as well and asked for continued patience as he attempts to turn it around.  Meanwhile, Q3’s results is looking “choppy.” In terms of products he is happy about, Armstrong again focused on the homepage—which attracts about 15 million uniques—and Patch and Mapquest.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-armstrong-mission-is-to-make-a-sick-company-healthy/" target="_blank">PaidContent.org</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Google CEO Schmidt: &#8220;People Aren&#8217;t Ready for the Technology Revolution&#8221;</strong></span></p>
<p>Eric Schmidt spoke at the <a href="http://techonomy.com/">Techonomy</a> conference in Lake Tahoe today and dropped some serious rhetorical bombs. &#8220;There was 5 exabytes of information created between the dawn of civilization through 2003,&#8221; Schmidt said, &#8220;but that much information is now created every 2 days, and the pace is increasing&#8230;People aren&#8217;t ready for the technology revolution that&#8217;s going to happen to them.&#8221;   The <a href="http://techonomy.com/">Techonomy</a> conference is a gathering of people from around the globe seeking to use technology to solve the world&#8217;s big problems. Schmidt spoke there today and said that people need to get ready for major technology disruption, fast.  The bulk of what&#8217;s contributing to this <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_coming_data_explosion.php">explosion of data</a>, Schmidt says, is user generated content. From that content, far more prediction than we&#8217;ve seen today is possible and will be a factor in the future.  &#8220;If I look at enough of your messaging and your location, and use Artificial Intelligence,&#8221; Schmidt said, &#8220;we can predict where you are going to go.&#8221;   &#8220;Show us 14 photos of yourself and we can identify who you are. You think you don&#8217;t have 14 photos of yourself on the internet? You&#8217;ve got Facebook photos! People will find it&#8217;s very useful to have devices that remember what you want to do, because you forgot&#8230;But society isn&#8217;t ready for questions that will be raised as result of user-generated content.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_ceo_schmidt_people_arent_ready_for_the_tech.php" target="_blank">ReadWriteWeb.com</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Demand Media Extends Content Model To Other Publishers, Hearst And Gannett First To Sign Up</strong></span></p>
<p>Demand Media on Thursday debuted a new service for publishers to pad their online offerings with the work of independent freelancers. Two of the first properties to employ Content Channels, so-called, include Hearst Corp.&#8217;s SFGate.com and Chron.com.  &#8220;Hearst is the second major publisher to select our product for their sites,&#8221; said Steve Semelsberger, SVP and general manager of the Business Solutions Group for Demand Media. (The first major publisher was Gannett&#8217;s USA Today, which recently employed Demand to power its &#8220;TravelTips&#8221; section.) Semelsberger said Demand Media&#8217;s studio team worked closely with the editorial teams of both SFGate.com and Chron.com to make sure the Content Channels met their editorial standards.  In the case of the <em>Houston Chronicle</em>&#8217;s Chron.com, the team worked with Demand Media to create a &#8220;Small Business Resource Center&#8221; to complement its existing business news coverage by incorporating thousands of business-related articles and videos. Content Channels also went live this week on <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>&#8217;s SFGate.com for its &#8220;Home Guides&#8221; section.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=133369&amp;nid=117312" target="_blank">MediaPost</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IAB Report Slams Most Online Research Methods</strong></span></p>
<p>Watch out, research firms! The Interactive Advertising Bureau has embarked on a broad initiative to improve online brand effectiveness research, and its initial findings aren&#8217;t pretty.  What&#8217;s wrong with most research that attempts to measure ad effectiveness? Small respondent size and low response rates for starters, according to an initial report from the IAB.  Above all else, the validity of such research is threatened &#8220;by the extremely low response rates achieved in most IAE studies,&#8221; according to Paul Lavrakas, Ph.D., the report&#8217;s author, and former chief research methodologist for the Nielsen Company.  Average research is also &#8220;threatened by the near-exclusive use of quasi-experimental research designs rather than classic experimental designs,&#8221; in the words of Lavrakas, author of &#8220;Telephone Survey Methods: Sampling, Selection, and Supervision.&#8221;  Worse still, industry research is often compromised by &#8220;a lack of valid empirical evidence that the statistical weighting adjustments &#8230; adequately correct for the biasing effects,&#8221; Lavrakas attests.  &#8220;In instances where the sample size is at the lower end of this range [less than 800 participants] and the clients want subsample analyses to be conducted &#8230; these subsamples may not have enough members in them to provide precise analyses,&#8221; Lavrakas concludes. &#8220;Thus, subsample analyses based on small sized subsamples [fewer than 100 participants in the subsample] will have relative large sampling errors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=133356&amp;nid=117312" target="_blank">MediaPost</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-138/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-137/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-137/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m&a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time Bidding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Magic of Machine Learning in Real Time
Part of the magic of real-time bidding is found within machine learning. This involves using sophisticated algorithms to &#8220;learn&#8221; complex patterns based on large amounts of data in order to make optimal advertising decisions. The importance of machine learning is cost avoidance and value creation. Cost avoidance is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Magic of Machine Learning in Real Time</strong></span></p>
<p>Part of the magic of real-time bidding is found within machine learning. This involves using sophisticated algorithms to &#8220;learn&#8221; complex patterns based on large amounts of data in order to make optimal advertising decisions. The importance of machine learning is cost avoidance <em>and</em> value creation. Cost avoidance is simple to understand: data-driven optimization strategies help reduce waste by identifying the most relevant impressions while selecting the best ads (better creative message, better offer, etc.), which in turn improves performance and ROI (<a href="http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/ROI.html" target="_new">define</a>). <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/1721814/creating-value-real-time">Value creation</a>, on the other hand, happens when buyers and sellers of commoditized offerings are more efficiently brought together for a transaction.  To create machine learning magic, two ingredients are required: scale and prediction. Scale speaks to the need to make more users/impressions available through the auction marketplaces, and increase the number of advertisers bidding on these users. The bigger the scale, the more sophisticated the data-driven prediction can be. The second ingredient refers to the idea that prediction needs to be &#8220;accurate enough.&#8221; Amazon and Netflix have demonstrated that when you provide an accurate prediction of what consumers want, the business grows in two ways:</p>
<ol>
<li>Better inventory control and more purchases/utilization.</li>
<li>Better targeting becomes a custom delight feature when it&#8217;s perceived to be quite accurate by average consumers.</li>
</ol>
<p>The ability to deliver relevant choices in real time based on what consumers reveal about themselves creates a virtuous cycle: </p>
<p>Ads/recommendations become more accurate → consumers are willing to share additional information about themselves → the machine learning algorithm for ads/recommendations becomes even smarter</p>
<p>In digital advertising, the machine learning prediction ultimately boils down to two parts: identifying your target audience and reaching them efficiently. The first part requires machine learning at the user level to learn the most optimal audience segments to target; the second requires machine learning to drive real-time bidding strategy with precision. For instance, demand side platform technology allows advertisers to have global control over how many times each user sees the ads (i.e., frequency capping) and how they see them. This begs the obvious question, &#8220;what is the optimal number of ad repetitions?&#8221; The answer might be an average of five times over a period of seven days. Problem solved? Not quite.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/1725570/the-magic-machine-learning-real-time" target="_blank">ClickZ</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BrightRoll Launches Video Ad Exchange</strong></span></p>
<p>Earlier this year, video ad company Adap.tv launched a video ad exchange in partnership with Gannett Co. and Publicis Groupe&#8217;s VivaKi digital unit. Now, its OneSource platform will have some competition from a rival video ad marketplace started by video ad network BrightRoll.  As with the online exchanges that have emerged in recent years for display and other types of advertising, the goal is to bring increased efficiency to the video sector by giving publishers a way to unload unsold inventory and media buyers an automated system for reaching particular audiences across a wide range of sites.  &#8220;What we&#8217;re essentially releasing is a video advertising business in a box for buyers of online advertising,&#8221; said BrightRoll CEO Tod Sacerdoti, who added that the new exchange dubbed BRX is an outgrowth of the company&#8217;s efforts to further automate its own ad network over the last 18 months. BrightRoll is the third-largest U.S. video ad network based on streaming video ads viewed &#8212; at 333,492 in June, according to comScore.  &#8220;We realized everything we were building was applicable to other media buyers and sellers,&#8221; said Sacerdoti. A BrightRoll study earlier this year found that half of publishers surveyed reported that at least 20% of their online video advertising inventory is never sold, suggesting the potential for an automated, auction-based marketplace for pre-roll ads.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=133181&amp;nid=117212" target="_blank">MediaPost</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Forbes Sells Investopedia To ValueClick For $42 Million</strong></span></p>
<p>After less than two months <a title="on the block" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-forbes-puts-personal-finance-site-investopedia-up-for-sale/">on the block</a>, Forbes Media has sold financial education site <a title="Investopedia" href="http://www.investopedia.com/">Investopedia</a> to lead gen provider ValueClick (<a title="VCLK" href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&amp;Ticker=VCLK">NSDQ: VCLK</a>) for $42 million. In June, Forbes retained the Jordan, Edmiston Group, Inc. three years after it <a title="bought" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-forbes-media-acquires-canandian-site-investopediacom/">bought</a> the Canadian-based site.  The announcement comes a few weeks after Forbes <a title="purchased" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-forbes-acquires-true-slant/">purchased</a> freelance journalism site True/Slant, which was <a title="shut down" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-forbes-trueslant-prepares-to-sign-off/">shut down</a> last week and will remain live as an archive site only.  Forbes had been an investor in True/Slant and before the purchase, it had hired site’s founder, Lewis DVorkin, as consultant to help restructure its digital offerings. The quick sale of Investopedia is a the first step in the struggling publisher’s latest digital reinvention. Despite the fact that Forbes was eager to sell the Edmonton, Alberta-based Investopedia, the company claimed that the site’s profits and users have grown in the past three years since it was acquired.  In a release, ValueClick CEO Jim Zarley said that Investopedia gives the company “great content, organic traffic and established advertiser relationships in the important financial services advertising vertical.” He also believes that the addition of Investopedia will be able to help build up its ValueClick Brands and ValueClick Media offerings.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-forbes-media-acquires-canandian-site-investopediacom/" target="_blank">PaidContent.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-137/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-133/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-133/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brands on Sidelines as Disney, Google and MTV Charge Into Social Games
There&#8217;s a land grab in social gaming, but at this point, it doesn&#8217;t look like there&#8217;s much room for advertisers.   On Tuesday, Disney acquired top-three developer Playdom for $563 million plus $200 million in incentives. Google, meanwhile, is reportedly in talks with Playdom, Electronic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Brands on Sidelines as Disney, Google and MTV Charge Into Social Games</strong></span></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a land grab in social gaming, but at this point, it doesn&#8217;t look like there&#8217;s much room for advertisers.   On Tuesday, Disney acquired top-three developer Playdom for $563 million plus $200 million in incentives. Google, meanwhile, is <a title="Google Develops a Facebook Rival" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703292704575393531040685308.html">reportedly in talks</a> with Playdom, Electronic Arts and Zynga in a social-gaming push. And MTV Networks this month acquired social-game developer Social Express and plans to launch games based on its TV shows later this year.  With the draw of their established storylines and characters in social games &#8212; not to mention well-oiled marketing machines &#8212; established media companies hope they can use casual gaming to grow and interact with their already massive audiences.  &#8220;When media companies integrate their brands, it&#8217;s going to be easier for people to get into the games because they are familiar and that will expand the market,&#8221; said Justin Smith, founder of social-game research firm Inside Network.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Johnson &amp; Johnson is Holding a Roster Review of its Estimated $3bn Media Business.</strong></span></p>
<p>On Tuesday, Disney acquired top-three developer Playdom for $563 million plus $200 million in incentives. Google, meanwhile, is <a class="body" title="Google Develops a Facebook Rival" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703292704575393531040685308.html"><span style="color: #cc6600;">reportedly in talks</span></a> with Playdom, Electronic Arts and Zynga in a social-gaming push. And MTV Networks this month acquired social-game developer Social Express and plans to launch games based on its TV shows later this year.  With the draw of their established storylines and characters in social games &#8212; not to mention well-oiled marketing machines &#8212; established media companies hope they can use casual gaming to grow and interact with their already massive audiences.  &#8220;When media companies integrate their brands, it&#8217;s going to be easier for people to get into the games because they are familiar and that will expand the market,&#8221; said Justin Smith, founder of social-game research firm Inside Network.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=145147" target="_blank">AdAge</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Mixed Ad Message From Newspapers</strong></span></p>
<p>Online advertising has turned into a good-news story for newspapers. Will it have legs?   Several newspaper publishers have reported solid growth in digital advertising revenue for the second quarter in recent days, helping offset continuing declines in print advertising. The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=NYT">New York Times</a>, for instance, reported 21% growth in digital-ad revenue against a 6% drop in print advertising, keeping total advertising &#8220;roughly flat&#8221; with the year-earlier quarter. Digital now accounts for 26% of its total ad revenue, up from 22%.  But that is mainly because print revenue has shrunk so much, rather than because digital has got so big. At the Times Co., print-ad revenue for the news group fell $15 million, to $232 million, while its digital-ad revenue rose $8.3 million. Growth at the About.com portal also boosted digital.</p>
<p>Industrywide, print-ad revenue fell by nearly half between 2000 and 2009, a loss of about $24 billion. But newspapers&#8217; online revenue totaled only $2.7 billion last year.  That includes online classifieds, a segment that has been under pressure from free alternatives. Display advertising, including video, is where newspapers have the most opportunity. The market still is relatively small, just $8 billion in U.S. revenue last year, or 35% of total Internet revenue, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau. And newspapers are competing for display dollars with major portals like <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=YHOO">Yahoo</a> and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=GOOG">Google</a> as well as lots of smaller sites.  One bright spot for newspapers is that their sites draw higher ad rates than most other categories, at least as measured by cost per thousand impressions, or CPMs, according to comScore. Precise CPM numbers are hard to come by, but these estimates offer some indication of the differences between sites.</p>
<p>Newspaper sites&#8217; CPMs in April were $6.99, while the rate for portals was $2.60 and 56 cents for social-networking sites, comScore estimates. Newspapers&#8217; traffic isn&#8217;t high enough for those rates to translate into huge dollars: Newspapers drew only 8.5 billion impressions in April, translating into a revenue estimate of $59.4 million for the month. Impressions were 69.7 billion for portals and 98 billion for social-networking sites, comScore reported, for revenue of $181 million and $54.7 million, respectively.  Professionally produced content helps make newspaper sites, at least those of major titles like the New York Times, attractive outlets for advertisers. Many marketers are reluctant to have their ads appear on heavily trafficked social-networking sites because of the uncertainty of the kind of content that appears on those sites.  Longer term, video and mobile advertising also offer hope. For now, though, investors need to be wary in assuming that newspapers&#8217; digital potential can outweigh the challenges in their legacy business.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703940904575395352749081586.html" target="_blank">WSJ</a> (Entire Article Here)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-133/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-131/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-131/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New NBCU Ad Network Plans to Reach Beyond NBCU Properties
NBC Universal is getting into the ad network business, first selling inventory across a handful of its own properties, then possibly expanding into others.  The network, called Universal Audience Platform, launched today with 21 NBCU properties, including Bravotv.com, NBC.com, Oxygen.com and Syfy.com. While advertisers have previously [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>New NBCU Ad Network Plans to Reach Beyond NBCU Properties</strong></span></p>
<p>NBC Universal is getting into the ad network business, first selling inventory across a handful of its own properties, then possibly expanding into others.  The network, called Universal Audience Platform, launched today with 21 NBCU properties, including Bravotv.com, NBC.com, Oxygen.com and Syfy.com. While advertisers have previously had the ability to buy packages that spanned NBCU properties, this is the first time they can buy display inventory based on audience segment rather than brand.  Asked why NBCU had chosen now to launch an ad network, Peter Naylor, VP of digital sales, said the company &#8220;has the impressions and uniques&#8221; to form &#8220;a credible entrance to the market.&#8221; But that doesn&#8217;t mean it will limit itself to NBCU properties.  &#8220;This is phase one,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Phase two is going to be when we welcome in some other sites we don&#8217;t wholly own and operate.&#8221;  Just when &#8211; or if &#8211; that will come to pass isn&#8217;t yet clear, said Naylor. But he did confirm that discussions were under way to find other suitable properties to add to the network.  For now, the formation of UAP means that NBCU will be &#8220;dialing down&#8221; its dependence on third-party ad networks, said Naylor. The company has made deals with BlueKai, Nielsen and Quantcast to supply the demographic data that it will use to sell audience segments to advertisers.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3641102" target="_blank">ClickZ</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Insights from OMMA Behavioral Conference on Display Marketing</strong></span></p>
<p>Several members of the EF team attended the <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/events/?/showID/OMMABehavioral.10.SF/type/Agenda/itemID/1287/OMMABehavioral-Agenda.html">OMMA Behavioral Conference</a> in San Francisco last week. The focus of the conference was to explore how behavioral targeting has changed from simply targeting audiences by the Web pages they have recently viewed to utilizing targeting data from multiple sources such as social networks, site and search re-targeting, and various third party data providers. Because there are so many targeting channels, attributing conversion to the appropriate source has become very difficult for advertisers. The difficulty of attribution modeling quickly became a hot topic at the conference.  Abhishek Pani, our Director of Research &amp; Quantitative Marketing, discussed a new attribution framework in his presentation titled “Evaluating the Marginal Value of Display”.  Optimal budget allocation across channels is the fundamental problem that advertisers want to solve but given the lack of proper attribution models, they are forced to rely on simple heuristics to allocate revenues. Current attribution offerings in the industry ignore important variables such as the effect of time and cross channel demand elasticity (change in demand in channel A that results from a small change in spend in channel B). Incorrect attribution will result in sub-optimal budget allocation and lower the return on advertising investment. Because our platform manages across all channels of advertising (search, display, and soon social), we are able to measure, experiment, and build very accurate allocation models based on marginal contributions of each channel.  Abhishek discussed our modeling strategy in greater detail during his presentation.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://blog.efrontier.com/insights/2010/07/insights-from-omma-behavioral-conference-on-display-marketing.html" target="_blank">blog.eFrontier.com</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>BuzzLogic to Announce New Social Media Ad Units</strong></span></p>
<p>By combining ads with content <a href="http://www.buzzlogic.com/">BuzzLogic </a>believes it can give consumers using social media a better ad experience and better integrate advertising with the content against which it is presented.   &#8220;We&#8217;ve been running all kinds of IAB sanctioned rich media for a while, but the BuzzRoll product is much more customized and gives marketers more options,&#8221; <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-buzzlogic-raises-8.8-million-second-round-adds-custom-rich-media-unit">said </a>Peter O&#8217;Sullivan, BuzzLogic&#8217;s VP of sales, in an interview with paidContent.  &#8220;BuzzRoll, as a social media ad unit, will drive greater engagement among blog readers, since it encourages them to share everything from a company&#8217;s blog content or a white paper, and Twitter feeds, to video and Facebook apps. This is just a simpler way for marketers to do it.  For example, if a product wanted to associate itself with a green image it could place an ad on a blog about green issues and, by careful keyword selection, program it to pull in content about the topic from around the Internet. That information is then scrolled along the bottom of the rich media ads.  <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3641107">According </a>to ClickZ, the units can also host video and Facebook applications via Facebook&#8217;s APIs.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.bizreport.com/2010/07/buzzroll-to-announce-new-social-media-ad-units.html" target="_blank">BizReport</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-131/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-130/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-130/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook Is to the Power Company as &#8230;
It was a typically vexing week for Facebook. On the one hand, the social-networking service signed up its 500 millionth active user. On the other hand, it was found to be one of the least popular private-sector companies in the United States by the American Customer Satisfaction Index. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Facebook Is to the Power Company as &#8230;</span></strong></p>
<p>It was a typically vexing week for Facebook. On the one hand, the social-networking service signed up its 500 millionth active user. On the other hand, it was found to be one of the least popular private-sector companies in the United States by <a title="press release on the social-media index" href="http://www.foreseeresults.com/research-white-papers/ACSI-e-business-report-2010.shtml">the American Customer Satisfaction Index</a>. Apparently, Americans were more satisfied filing their taxes online than they were posting updates on their Facebook page.  It is a continuing contradiction: Facebook is widely criticized for shifting its terms of service and for disclosing private information — and yet millions of people start accounts each month.  Analysts always grasp for analogies to explain Facebook’s tortured relationship with its users. Facebook has been called the sterile suburbs to the gritty urban Internet; it is a “walled garden” in the organic messiness of the Web; it is Russia under Vladimir Putin; it is (and this one stings in tech circles) today’s AOL.  But perhaps the most telling metaphor compares Facebook to the other companies lurking at the bottom of the American Customer Satisfaction Index: cable companies, wireless telephone service providers. Utilities. Here are services everyone uses, no matter how much people dislike the companies that provide them.  Danah Boyd, a social media researcher at Microsoft and a fellow at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society, argues that Facebook fits that mold.  On her blog in May, <a title="blog post" href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/05/15/facebook-is-a-utility-utilities-get-regulated.html">she posted</a>:  “I hate all of the utilities of my life. Venomous hatred. And because they’re monopolies, they feel no need to make me appreciate them. Cuz they know that I’m not going to give up water, power, sewage, or the Internet out of spite. Nor will most people give up Facebook, regardless of how much they grow to hate them.”</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/weekinreview/25brustein.html?_r=1" target="_blank">NYTimes.com</a></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">An Ad Model Poised For A Comeback</span></strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s challenging for media buyers to differentiate among ad networks. From the network side, it&#8217;s difficult to develop a product positioning that is truly ownable within the space. In an era where anyone can start an ad network, virtually overnight, any networks getting traction with ad buyers quickly find themselves swimming in a sea of &#8220;me too&#8221; imitators.  On the publisher&#8217;s side of the equation, it&#8217;s even more difficult to tell which networks to use. It&#8217;s one of the primary challenges of the chief revenue officer to balance direct sales forces, ad networks, exchanges, and new ad platforms in such a way as to deliver a maximum return from month to month on a site&#8217;s pool of available ad inventory.  There&#8217;s a check that comes in from each network partner each month. From a CPM standpoint, the price paid is abysmally low when compared to deals struck by the publisher&#8217;s direct sales force. But it&#8217;s a check nonetheless, and most publishers choose to get a check for the incremental sales, rather than rely completely on direct sales channels and risk lower overall returns.  Simply put, two ad revenue streams are better than one, even if one undercuts the pricing of the other one, and publishers are unsure what&#8217;s being done with data collected from network and exchange campaigns. Even though many would see it as short-sighted, short-term revenue, pressure usually makes the publisher take the check rather than cut the channel to support the direct sales channel.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/27244.asp" target="_blank">iMediaConnection</a></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Closing the Tech Divide</span></strong></p>
<p>If there was a single familiar refrain from digital shops over the past decade, it was that their older, traditional-agency brethren &#8220;didn&#8217;t get it&#8221; when it came to digital. But lately, that widely acknowledged gap has begun to narrow to the point where &#8220;older&#8221; agencies can claim more success in some areas of digital marketing.  Take the recent <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/creative/features/e3i3639278d2189e4efb741cf130fdfc31f" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Old Spice &#8220;The Man Your Man Could Smell Like&#8221;</span></a> digital campaign, an effort that is already a textbook example of how an advertiser can make itself a vital part of digital culture. The campaign didn&#8217;t come from any of the digital-agency stalwarts like R/GA, AKQA or Razorfish. Instead, it came from Wieden + Kennedy, a shop not long ago often labeled as wedded to TV and print.  The Old Spice success followed a strong showing for non-digital specialists in this year&#8217;s awards shows. At Cannes, for example, <a href="http://www.realtimecannes.com/2010/06/video-cyber-jury-president-jeff-benjamin.html" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">top honors in the Cyber category</span></a> went to Wieden for Nike Livestrong&#8217;s &#8220;Chalkbot&#8221; and DDB Sweden for Volkswagen&#8217;s &#8220;Fun Theory.&#8221; The Cyber Agency of the Year Award went to Crispin Porter + Bogusky.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3ic193b6eacf48409bd48011b98d52217b" target="_blank">AdWeek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-130/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-125/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-125/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-Time Bidding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Inside Story: An Anonymous Ex-AOL Exec Tells All

When AOL CEO Tim Armstrong joined the company in spring 2009, he announced he&#8217;d take just 100 days to figure out what to do to turn around the one-time tech industry leader.  In about a week, it will be a year since AOL celebrated the end of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Inside Story: An Anonymous Ex-AOL Exec Tells All</p>
<p></span></strong></p>
<p>When AOL CEO Tim Armstrong joined the company in spring 2009, he announced he&#8217;d take just 100 days to figure out what to do to turn around the one-time tech industry leader.  In about a week, it will be a year since AOL celebrated the end of those 100 days with a big party in Dulles, Virginia on July 24, 2009.  It&#8217;s been a huge 12 months for AOL since. There were layoffs, a massive voluntary-buyout program, a re-branding, major product-rollouts, and of course, AOL&#8217;s December 2009 spin-off from Time Warner.  Also during that time: just about every corporate-level executive left the company – usually to be replaced with an ex-Googler.  Recently, we spoke with one of these former AOL executives to find out what it was really like when Tim Armstrong came to save AOL.  Here&#8217;s that inside story.</p>
<p><em>SAI: How did word break in February 2009 that CEO Randy Falco and president Ron Grant were out?</em></p>
<p><em>Former AOL exec:</em> As soon as it happened Ron started calling his team. Word obviously spread incredibly quickly. Rumors started to break that afternoon because [Time Warner CEO] Jeff Bewkes made a surprise visit actually to the AOL headquarters downtown. For Jeff Bewkes to come out of the Time Warner building on the Upper West Side was highly unusual. So I think people were extremely sensitive to what was going on when he was spotted in the building — it’s a very open layout, the office space, so everything’s pretty visible.   Upon Jeff leaving people started twittering and everything else and I think that’s why Ron started picked up the phone so quickly and just started dialing.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-inside-story-an-anonymous-ex-aol-exec-tells-all-2010-7" target="_blank">BusinessInsider.com</a></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">DoubleClick White Paper: The Value of Dynamic Pricing &amp; Auction Pricing</span></strong></p>
<p>We’re often asked to quantify the incremental value DoubleClick Ad Exchange can provide compared with publishers’ existing yield management techniques. According to proprietary research conducted in the first half of 2010, <strong>the combined effects of auction pressure and Dynamic Allocation in DoubleClick Ad Exchange resulted in an average CPM lift of 136%</strong> compared with fixed, upfront, pre-negotiated sales of non-guaranteed inventory.   In a new <a href="http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en/us/adexchange/DC_Ad_Exchange_WP_100713.pdf">white paper</a>, we take a step back to explain how publishers are managing yield across their pool of non-guaranteed inventory today, and what steps they can take to create efficiencies and boost overall revenue. <strong>Key elements of the white paper include</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>How publishers segment and sell ad inventory. </strong>How manual optimization processes often fail to capture all available revenue opportunities</li>
<li><strong>Dynamic Allocation explained. </strong>What it is, how it works, and what it means for publishers’ bottom lines.</li>
<li><strong>Auction pricing mechanics.</strong> Real-time pricing’s core advantages over the use of historical CPMs for non-guaranteed ad space.</li>
<li><strong>A brief look forward. </strong>The potential for DoubleClick Ad Exchange and its ecosystem of publishers, technology providers, advertisers and agencies.</li>
</ul>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://doubleclickpublishers.blogspot.com/2010/07/read-doubleclick-ad-exchange-white.html" target="_blank">DoubleClickPublishers.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-125/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-118/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-118/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Glantz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MySpace Up For Grabs
News Corp. is in discussions with Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc. about replacing MySpace&#8217;s crucial search-advertising partnership with Google, which expires next month, according to people familiar with the matter.  Under the existing deal, Google agreed to make up to $900 million in guaranteed payments for the right to sell [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>MySpace Up For Grabs</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=NWS">News Corp.</a> is in discussions with <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=GOOG">Google</a> Inc., <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=MSFT">Microsoft</a> Corp. and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=YHOO">Yahoo</a> Inc. about replacing MySpace&#8217;s crucial search-advertising partnership with Google, which expires next month, according to people familiar with the matter.  Under the existing deal, Google agreed to make up to $900 million in guaranteed payments for the right to sell small ads as users surf and tap out searches on News Corp.&#8217;s My Space.com and on a handful of smaller News Corp. websites.  But recently, MySpace has fallen far short of Web traffic and other milestones laid out in the Google contract, which expires at the end of August.  </p>
<p>In recent weeks, News Corp. has been discussing new, narrower advertising deals with Google and other companies, said the people familiar with the matter.  People close to News Corp. said any new agreement will be for significantly less money. That would be a further financial challenge for MySpace, which has seen ad revenue slip.  Google and Yahoo declined to comment.  Google in 2006 beat out Microsoft and Yahoo for the ad pact, which was regarded at the time as justifying News Corp.&#8217;s purchase of MySpace&#8217;s parent company for $650 million. News Corp. also owns The Wall Street Journal.  The deal is winding down at a turbulent point. MySpace has seen turnover among several top-level executives, including Co-President Jason Hirschhorn last month.</p>
<p>The website also is in the midst of a remodeling to stand apart from Facebook Inc., which has surpassed MySpace as the dominant online place for people to swap stories, comments and photos with friends and acquaintances.  Reviving MySpace is a high-level project for News Corp., which dispatched Chief Digital Officer <a href="http://topics.wsj.com/person/m/jonathan-f-miller/339">Jon Miller</a> to oversee the effort. MySpace also is a test of whether Internet properties can rebuild buzz and revenue growth once they have ebbed. That&#8217;s also the task facing <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=AOL">AOL</a> Inc. and Yahoo, both of which are in the middle of turnaround efforts.  News Corp. executives say they believe privacy and other concerns about Facebook leave an opening for MySpace to attract new users and business partners, though they also say MySpace doesn&#8217;t expect or need to be as big as Facebook.  Instead, MySpace says it is focused on Web surfers younger than 35, and is offering them a place to find new music, videos, games and other diversions, and to locate new people with similar interests. </p>
<p>MySpace has also touted its initiatives to allow users to easily keep secret their personal information such as photos, birth date and hobbies, a counter to recent privacy worries about Facebook.  MySpace&#8217;s new strategy in addition includes ways for musicians, comedians, authors and fashion designers to gather an audience and tools to measure who and where their fans are.  A band, for instance, could use MySpace to share music with fans and get feedback, as well as adjust their touring schedule to add concerts in Texas, for example, if the musicians see their MySpace fan base is heavily from that state. </p>
<p>MySpace also plans in coming months to roll out new applications for cellphones and to overhaul its site, possibly including a new logo.  Aaron Shapiro, a partner at online-marketing firm Huge, said MySpace can carve out a niche alongside Facebook and Twitter, but he cautioned that MySpace still has a long way to go to make the website easier to use and to incorporate slicker design and technology.  &#8220;They&#8217;ve been frozen in time for four years in terms of their degree of innovation,&#8221; he said.  More than a year into its shift, MySpace attracted 109 million unique world-wide visitors in May, down nearly 13% from the same month last year, according to comScore Inc.  Facebook had more than 548 million global users, up 74%.  MySpace executives say they are focusing on increasing the percentage of the U.S. population of 13- to 34-year-olds who visit the site each month to 75% from 50%.  &#8220;My goal is to saturate that specific audience,&#8221; said MySpace President Mike Jones.  Mr. Jones became the top MySpace executive after Mr. Hirschhorn stepped down in June, which in turn came just months after Chief Executive Owen Van Natta was pushed out.  MySpace also has cut about 30% of its work force, and News Corp. took a $450 million charge last year to write down the value of MySpace and other digital businesses.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703620604575348963172170250.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">WSJ.com</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>At Yahoo, Using Searches to Steer News Coverage</strong></span></p>
<p>Welcome to the era of the algorithm as editor.  For as long as hot lead has been used to make metal type, the model for generating news has been top-down: editors determined what information was important and then shared it with the masses.  But with the advent of technology that allows media companies to identify what kind of content readers want, that model is becoming inverted.  The latest and perhaps broadest effort yet in democratizing the news is under way at Yahoo, which on Tuesday will introduce a news blog that will rely on search queries to help guide its reporting and writing on national affairs, politics and the media.  Search-generated content has been growing on the Internet, linked to the success of companies like <a title="The site." href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/">Associated Content</a>, which Yahoo recently bought, and <a title="The site." href="http://www.demandmedia.com/">Demand Media</a>, which has used freelance writers to create an online library of more than a million instructional articles.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/business/media/05yahoo.html?_r=1" target="_blank">NYTimes.com</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Google&#8217;s Display Advertising Plans Include Gmail and YouTube</strong></span></p>
<p>For a company that has made a big business of indexing third-party websites, a substantial part of Google&#8217;s display success hinges on its ability to milk YouTube and its other owned and operated properties such as Gmail and Google Finance.  In fact, those areas were two of the three big priorities outlined by VP Neal Mohan at a press briefing last week where a parade of Google executives described the company&#8217;s plans to expand its ad business beyond search keywords.  &#8220;Display is truly at a tipping point,&#8221; Mr. Mohan said. &#8220;We think it can be substantially larger than the $20 billion it is today, whether [it's] $40 billion, $60 billion, or $80 billion, but there are a lot of challenges that remain.&#8221;  Mr. Mohan said there were gross inefficiencies to the display ad buying process. As an example, he said it takes 30 days or more to get a creative advertising unit up and running. &#8220;That process should be much more streamlined,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=144798" target="_blank">AdAge</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-118/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News of the Day</title>
		<link>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-109/</link>
		<comments>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-109/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pramod Tummala</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indotmedia.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eXelate Bows Tool for Web Publishers
eXelate, which manages a large online targeting data exchange, is rolling out a new tool that will allow Web publishers to better manage the sale and use of their own user data.  The new product is called teXi:PM, which stands for &#8220;private marketplace.” According to eXelate executives, publishers can use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>eXelate Bows Tool for Web Publishers</strong></span></p>
<p>eXelate, which manages a large online targeting data exchange, is rolling out a new tool that will allow Web publishers to better manage the sale and use of their own user data.  The new product is called teXi:PM, which stands for &#8220;private marketplace.” According to eXelate executives, publishers can use teXi:PM to control how ad networks, agencies, demand-side platforms or other clients access their data. Publishers can also control how that information is sold. In addition, sites can employ teXi:PM to set price controls and initiate data transactions.  Publishers that elect to create their own data marketplaces using teXi:PM will not be precluded from also selling their data via eXelate’s exchange, which the company claims represents sites and networks that in aggregate reach 150 million unique users each month.  eXelate has signed on WhitePages as one of the first Web publishers to use teXi:PM to create a private data exchange.  “[This] partnership will allow us to extend the value of our users’ business search behaviors to marketers using a single technology platform, while still protecting consumer privacy,” said Ingrid Michelsen, WhitePages senior director, ad sales, strategy and development.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i90084bf05b70386ffc4ccc7a0414ac00" target="_blank">AdWeek</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Former TiVo President to Lead Joint &#8220;Hulu for Magazines&#8221; Effort</strong></span></p>
<p>The movement to create a &#8220;Hulu for magazines&#8221; hasn&#8217;t gotten much traction lately, but it has gotten a new CEO: Morgan Guenther, who is best known as the president of TiVo from 2001-2003.  Guenther will take the reigns of Next Issue Media, a joint venture of Condé Nast, Hearst, Meredith, News Corporation and Time Inc. to create a digital hub where consumers can access magazine articles the way they access TV clips on Hulu.  &#8220;Next Issue Media is well positioned to create and deliver incremental business opportunities to the magazine and newspaper publishing world,&#8221; said Guenther in a written statement. &#8220;The potential for value creation across the entire industry ecosystem&#8230; is massive. Our task now is to execute on that potential.&#8221;  The project, originally announced in December of 2009, has taken on an air of urgency since the successful launch of the iPad. One of Next Issue&#8217;s primary goals is to make magazines as accessible to e-readers like the iPad and Kindle as books and some newspapers are now. With more than 2 million iPads sold since launch of the device in April, the stakes are considerably higher for anyone looking to create a successful magazine app.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.clickz.com/3640649" target="_blank">ClickZ</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>How Yahoo Bought Associated Content</strong></span></p>
<p>Last month, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/yahoo-buys-associated-content-for-100-million-2010-5">Yahoo bought Associated Content</a>, a Web publishing startup with thousands of semi-pro freelance writers, for around $100 million.  $100 million isn&#8217;t much for a company like Yahoo (YHOO), and a big content deal helped Yahoo define itself, so the acquisition seems like a smart move. Here&#8217;s the story of how it happened. (<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-inside-story-how-yahoo-bought-associated-content-2010-6#march-2009-aol-names-tim-armstrong-ceo-he-wants-to-buy-associated-content-1">Click here for the picture-book version.</a>)  Before there was Yahoo, there was AOL.  Back in August 2009, everybody assumed AOL (AOL) was going to buy Associated Content. And, for a while, everybody was right. AOL began <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/three-months-ago-aol-tried-to-buy-associated-content-2009-12">looking</a> at Associated Content almost as soon as Tim Armstrong became AOL CEO in March 2009. The acquisition fit into Tim&#8217;s plan to turn AOL into a lean, mean Time Inc. for the 21st Century.</p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-inside-story-how-yahoo-bought-associated-content-2010-6" target="_blank">BusinessInsider</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indotmedia.com/news/news-of-the-day-109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
