In.media logo

News of the Day

Posted by Adam Glantz on July 23, 2010

Right Media Exchange Update From Yahoo! VP McGrory

The following is an excerpted interview with Ramsey McGrory, Yahoo! VP and Head of Right Media Exchange.  McGrory discusses recently announced plans for Yahoo!’s display advertising exchange – Right Media Exchange.  Topics covered include:

The results of the Demand-Side Platform (DSP) Pilot Program…
A new Search Engine Marketing pilot on Right Media Exchange…
Demand Media, a publisher for RTB participants on Right Media Exchange…
On Right Media Open, an event produced this week by Yahoo! for its Right Media partners…

On the results of the Demand-Side Platform (DSP) Pilot Program…

RM: The specifics on DSPs are actually pretty good. We expected to see improvements in targeting. We expected to see, conversely, that would mean higher bidding, which is valuable to the publishers. And so I think we generally got what we bargained for. Which is the targeting efficiency, the control of frequency, the control of cost. The DSPs are, by and large, moving directionally on executing on that vision. That’s a good thing.

Read More: AdExchanger

The Career-Relevant Timeframe

I’m attending the Right Media Open in Chicago and, no surprise, change is in the air. Although there is a general consensus on where the industry is headed, I am seeing a healthy debate around the timeline for that change.  While discussing the importance of indirect, bid-based sales to publishers, Dave Zinnman from Yahoo pumped on the brakes, saying that if you believe exchange-based inventory will become dominant in a “career-relevant timeframe”, you need to “step back from the punch bowl.” For me, “career-relevant timeframe” is the most important phrase I’ve heard today.  No matter what your business, its important to have a realistic understanding of how fast your market is changing. Just today, VMM founder Darren Herman retweeted his 2008 post comparing the rate of innovation with the rate of adoption, and reminding entrepreneurs to build for today’s market. That’s the relevant timeframe for a venture backed startup between rounds.  Here in Chicago, the question of the day is: what is the relevant timeframe for advertising-related companies evaluating the momentous shift toward automation?  Up until now, I think media decisionmakers have been very confident in their ability to influence the rate and direction of change. At the 2009 24/7 Real Media Summit, I was struck by GroupM CEO Irwin Gotlieb’s remark that he felt it was, in some part, his responsibility to manage change in this new media landscape on behalf of various stakeholders. Consolidated media buying firms exist for the sake of exerting this type of influence and the comment made me think a lot about how and when the industry would change.

 Read More: GregHills.com

RockYou Strikes Virtual Currency Deal With Facebook

RockYou has entered into a five-year agreement to make Facebook Credits the exclusive payment option in its social games and applications on the social network. The deal, unveiled Thursday, is a boon for Facebook, as RockYou is one of the largest developers on the site, with about 34.6 million monthly active users and 2.7 million daily active users, according to Inside Network’s AppData.  The move helps ensure that Facebook’s virtual currency will gain wider distribution across the site. Until recently, Facebook Credits, which cost 10 cents each and allow users to buy virtual goods in games and apps, had only been available in a limited number of apps for testing.  But Facebook has lately been trying to build the user base for Credits through deals with significant developers, who get a 70% cut of revenue from sales suing the virtual currency. Some developers, principally game maker Zynga, have resisted offering Credits because of the 30% cut Facebook takes.  In a five-year deal announced in May, however, Zynga broadly pledged to expand the use of Credits in its games, which include wildly popular titles like “FarmVille” and “Mafia Wars.” Separately, smaller developers including CrowdStar and Lolapps have also signed exclusive five-year deals to use Facebook Credits exclusively.

Read More: MediaPost

iPad As A Business Tool? Probably Not Yet

AT&T’s activation of 3.2 million iPhones in the second quarter got the attention of the tech media Thursday, highlighting the Apple device’s continued importance to the company’s wireless business.  But during its earnings conference call, AT&T also shed some light on that hot-selling Apple product, the iPad. The carrier said it activated 400,000 to 500,000 iPad 3Gs in the quarter, with usage about as expected — higher than a typical iPhone user, but less than someone using a laptop. Apple said last week that 3 million of the Apple tablets had been sold since its April 3 launch.  Tim Cook, Apple’s chief operating officer, said during the company’s conference call this week that it is selling iPads and iPhone 4s as fast as it can make them. And apparently the iPad doesn’t appeal only to consumers. AT&T’s Chief Financial Officer Rick Lindner said Thursday the company has been surprised by the level of interest among business users.  When the iPhone was first launched, he noted that businesses, and especially chief information officers, were reluctant to adopt the phone as a business tool. “Over time that’s changed dramatically,” he said. But “right from the beginning with the iPad, we’ve had a number of business customers express interest.” Lindner also suggested some companies might even use iPads to replace laptops.

Read More: MediaPost

Top 5 Things You Should Do To Beef Up Your Social Media Profiles

Posted by Scott Berkson on March 11, 2010

Social media. Buzz words?  Yes.  Important for your job search?  An understatement.

Talking turkey for a moment, if you don’t have a profile up on LinkedIn, you’re a dinosaur.  If you’re not on Facebook, maybe not quite so bad, but not great either.

Last year, Jump Start Social Media conducted a survey that found 75% of recruiters use LinkedIn to conduct candidate searches.  48% use Facebook and 26% turn to the Twit-monster.  My guess?  These percentages are much higher now.

That said, I can’t tell you how many times a client comes to me for help with a resume but doesn’t think about their social media branding efforts.  Most have a LinkedIn page but with nothing significant on it.  Many are not involved with Facebook or Twitter.  Having a page on LinkedIn that just lists the places you’ve worked is like joining Match.com and not posting a picture of yourself. Who the hell is going to call you?

Read More: Let’s Talk Turkey

News of the Day

Posted by Adam Glantz on January 12, 2010

Ad Network? Video Ad Network? Why Not Both?

Ever wonder why a separate class of so-called video ad networks emerged over the last decade? Or, why more display ad networks don’t serve pre-roll video ads? The reason is simple: a lack of standards for video ad serving required specialized technology to translate between a network’s ad server and the growing hodgepodge of different publisher video player implementations. This was not an insignificant undertaking, so networks choosing to focus limited technical and operational resources on it became, de facto, video ad networks. But all that’s about to change, due to the IAB’s ground-breaking standard for online pre-roll video advertising (or “VAST”, if you like acronyms).

Read More: AdAge

Ad Servers Rigged To Be DSP’s

Previously I wrote about adservers touching on Full Service options and open source options on the publisher side. One trend I would like to highlight is manipulating Adserver arrangements to put together a Demand Side Optimization Platform (DSP).  This seems to be a trend with smaller networks setting up “private networks”.

Read More: Mobtown Labs

On a Scale From 1 to 10, How Weird Are You?

This interview with Tony Hsieh, the chief executive of Zappos.com, was conducted and condensed by Adam Bryant.

Q. What are some of the most important leadership lessons you’ve learned?

A. After college, a roommate and I started a company called LinkExchange in 1996, and it grew to about 100 or so people, and then we ended up selling the company to Microsoft in 1998. From the outside, it looked like it was a great acquisition, $265 million, but most people don’t know the real reason why we ended up selling the company.

Read More: NY Times

ABOUT

in.media's core mission is to maintain a community inside digital media (in 'dot' media). We will keep you informed of the most important news stories, discuss issues and opportunities facing our industry and provide those who are working in the trenches a vehicle to voice their own opinions.

FOLLOW US

facebook twitter linkedin rss

SEARCH