Brands on Sidelines as Disney, Google and MTV Charge Into Social Games

There’s a land grab in social gaming, but at this point, it doesn’t look like there’s much room for advertisers.   On Tuesday, Disney acquired top-three developer Playdom for $563 million plus $200 million in incentives. Google, meanwhile, is reportedly in talks with Playdom, Electronic Arts and Zynga in a social-gaming push. And MTV Networks this month acquired social-game developer Social Express and plans to launch games based on its TV shows later this year.  With the draw of their established storylines and characters in social games — not to mention well-oiled marketing machines — established media companies hope they can use casual gaming to grow and interact with their already massive audiences.  “When media companies integrate their brands, it’s going to be easier for people to get into the games because they are familiar and that will expand the market,” said Justin Smith, founder of social-game research firm Inside Network.

Johnson & Johnson is Holding a Roster Review of its Estimated $3bn Media Business.

On Tuesday, Disney acquired top-three developer Playdom for $563 million plus $200 million in incentives. Google, meanwhile, is reportedly in talks with Playdom, Electronic Arts and Zynga in a social-gaming push. And MTV Networks this month acquired social-game developer Social Express and plans to launch games based on its TV shows later this year.  With the draw of their established storylines and characters in social games — not to mention well-oiled marketing machines — established media companies hope they can use casual gaming to grow and interact with their already massive audiences.  “When media companies integrate their brands, it’s going to be easier for people to get into the games because they are familiar and that will expand the market,” said Justin Smith, founder of social-game research firm Inside Network.

Read More: AdAge

Mixed Ad Message From Newspapers

Online advertising has turned into a good-news story for newspapers. Will it have legs?   Several newspaper publishers have reported solid growth in digital advertising revenue for the second quarter in recent days, helping offset continuing declines in print advertising. The New York Times, for instance, reported 21% growth in digital-ad revenue against a 6% drop in print advertising, keeping total advertising “roughly flat” with the year-earlier quarter. Digital now accounts for 26% of its total ad revenue, up from 22%.  But that is mainly because print revenue has shrunk so much, rather than because digital has got so big. At the Times Co., print-ad revenue for the news group fell $15 million, to $232 million, while its digital-ad revenue rose $8.3 million. Growth at the About.com portal also boosted digital.

Industrywide, print-ad revenue fell by nearly half between 2000 and 2009, a loss of about $24 billion. But newspapers’ online revenue totaled only $2.7 billion last year.  That includes online classifieds, a segment that has been under pressure from free alternatives. Display advertising, including video, is where newspapers have the most opportunity. The market still is relatively small, just $8 billion in U.S. revenue last year, or 35% of total Internet revenue, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau. And newspapers are competing for display dollars with major portals like Yahoo and Google as well as lots of smaller sites.  One bright spot for newspapers is that their sites draw higher ad rates than most other categories, at least as measured by cost per thousand impressions, or CPMs, according to comScore. Precise CPM numbers are hard to come by, but these estimates offer some indication of the differences between sites.

Newspaper sites’ CPMs in April were $6.99, while the rate for portals was $2.60 and 56 cents for social-networking sites, comScore estimates. Newspapers’ traffic isn’t high enough for those rates to translate into huge dollars: Newspapers drew only 8.5 billion impressions in April, translating into a revenue estimate of $59.4 million for the month. Impressions were 69.7 billion for portals and 98 billion for social-networking sites, comScore reported, for revenue of $181 million and $54.7 million, respectively.  Professionally produced content helps make newspaper sites, at least those of major titles like the New York Times, attractive outlets for advertisers. Many marketers are reluctant to have their ads appear on heavily trafficked social-networking sites because of the uncertainty of the kind of content that appears on those sites.  Longer term, video and mobile advertising also offer hope. For now, though, investors need to be wary in assuming that newspapers’ digital potential can outweigh the challenges in their legacy business.

Read More: WSJ (Entire Article Here)

Facebook Is to the Power Company as …

It was a typically vexing week for Facebook. On the one hand, the social-networking service signed up its 500 millionth active user. On the other hand, it was found to be one of the least popular private-sector companies in the United States by the American Customer Satisfaction Index. Apparently, Americans were more satisfied filing their taxes online than they were posting updates on their Facebook page.  It is a continuing contradiction: Facebook is widely criticized for shifting its terms of service and for disclosing private information — and yet millions of people start accounts each month.  Analysts always grasp for analogies to explain Facebook’s tortured relationship with its users. Facebook has been called the sterile suburbs to the gritty urban Internet; it is a “walled garden” in the organic messiness of the Web; it is Russia under Vladimir Putin; it is (and this one stings in tech circles) today’s AOL.  But perhaps the most telling metaphor compares Facebook to the other companies lurking at the bottom of the American Customer Satisfaction Index: cable companies, wireless telephone service providers. Utilities. Here are services everyone uses, no matter how much people dislike the companies that provide them.  Danah Boyd, a social media researcher at Microsoft and a fellow at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society, argues that Facebook fits that mold.  On her blog in May, she posted:  “I hate all of the utilities of my life. Venomous hatred. And because they’re monopolies, they feel no need to make me appreciate them. Cuz they know that I’m not going to give up water, power, sewage, or the Internet out of spite. Nor will most people give up Facebook, regardless of how much they grow to hate them.”

Read More: NYTimes.com

An Ad Model Poised For A Comeback

It’s challenging for media buyers to differentiate among ad networks. From the network side, it’s difficult to develop a product positioning that is truly ownable within the space. In an era where anyone can start an ad network, virtually overnight, any networks getting traction with ad buyers quickly find themselves swimming in a sea of “me too” imitators.  On the publisher’s side of the equation, it’s even more difficult to tell which networks to use. It’s one of the primary challenges of the chief revenue officer to balance direct sales forces, ad networks, exchanges, and new ad platforms in such a way as to deliver a maximum return from month to month on a site’s pool of available ad inventory.  There’s a check that comes in from each network partner each month. From a CPM standpoint, the price paid is abysmally low when compared to deals struck by the publisher’s direct sales force. But it’s a check nonetheless, and most publishers choose to get a check for the incremental sales, rather than rely completely on direct sales channels and risk lower overall returns.  Simply put, two ad revenue streams are better than one, even if one undercuts the pricing of the other one, and publishers are unsure what’s being done with data collected from network and exchange campaigns. Even though many would see it as short-sighted, short-term revenue, pressure usually makes the publisher take the check rather than cut the channel to support the direct sales channel.

Read More: iMediaConnection

Closing the Tech Divide

If there was a single familiar refrain from digital shops over the past decade, it was that their older, traditional-agency brethren “didn’t get it” when it came to digital. But lately, that widely acknowledged gap has begun to narrow to the point where “older” agencies can claim more success in some areas of digital marketing.  Take the recent Old Spice “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” digital campaign, an effort that is already a textbook example of how an advertiser can make itself a vital part of digital culture. The campaign didn’t come from any of the digital-agency stalwarts like R/GA, AKQA or Razorfish. Instead, it came from Wieden + Kennedy, a shop not long ago often labeled as wedded to TV and print.  The Old Spice success followed a strong showing for non-digital specialists in this year’s awards shows. At Cannes, for example, top honors in the Cyber category went to Wieden for Nike Livestrong’s “Chalkbot” and DDB Sweden for Volkswagen’s “Fun Theory.” The Cyber Agency of the Year Award went to Crispin Porter + Bogusky.

Read More: AdWeek

The Untapped Profit Opportunity For Ecommerce Sites

The first 15 years of online retail saw breakneck growth and little reason to focus on anything but transactional revenue. As the medium matures, the smartest retailers will recognize they are sitting on a gold mine of media impressions and consumer behaviors that can keep the bottom line growing even as transactional growth slows.  Retail Web sites boast one of the best audiences a marketer could ask for: people who are actively researching and shopping products, practically raising their hands that they are currently in-market. In fact, brick-and-mortar stores have recognized this value for years, selling their suppliers premium placement such as end-cap displays, eye-level shelf space, and store circular ads.  Yet most online retailers are barely scratching the surface of the potential. The untapped media sales opportunity in online retail becomes even clearer when you look at conversion rates. Typically less than 5% of a Web site’s shoppers actually transact — but 100% of that traffic is valuable to advertisers since many of those shoppers will go on to buy elsewhere.  So why haven’t online retailers stepped up their game for in-store advertising?

Read More: MediaPost

YuMe Adds Brand Security

Online video has the undisputed numbers to attract advertisers, now it needs to inspire the confidence to seal the deal. To that end, video advertising technology company YuMe today announced that it has added brand security capabilities to its ACE technology platform.  The new capabilities leverage YuMe’s proprietary domain detection technology, which can collect detailed information about the in-page environment of a syndicated or embeddable player when it makes an ad request, even when the player is not associated with a companion banner.  This allows YuMe to prevent ads from running in video players that have been embedded on inappropriate websites, and to work with publishers to constantly monitor and improve the list of sites where their syndicated and user-embeddable players are appearing.  “The majority of online video publishers—including some of the biggest media companies in the world—have chosen to syndicate their premium online video content and to offer user-embeddable video players, and we want to be able to reach these online video audiences while keeping our customers’ brands safe” said Jonathan Nelson, CEO of Omnicom Digital.  “We are pleased that YuMe has chosen to make an ongoing investment in brand security, combining regular monitoring and research with proactive technology to prevent inappropriate impressions before they happen.”

Read More: DigidayDaily

IPG and AOL Unveil Plan to Improve Retail Marketing

Madison Avenue officially kicks off one of its annual summer rites today – in the South of France – where agencies will compete to prove who is most innovative and creative during the 57th annual Cannes Lions advertising festival. Some of the competition will take place during the judging sessions, of which one judging insider tells OMD U.S. agencies have made the most number of entries to the “short list,” followed by Sweden. Some of the competition will take place in presentations and panel discussions. And some of the competition will take place in the obligatory press announcements that agencies use to score bragging rights amid all the industry attention. Interpublic’s Mediabrands was first to score on the latter front, announcing an innovative online retail marketing initiative with AOL.  The deal, which the companies boasted would “re-invent digital retail advertising,” combines the research and development assets of Interpublic units with the ability of AOL to mobilize and activate its massive online user base.  The end goal is to develop new technologies that benefit both online consumers and marketers in the retail marketing process.

 Read More: MediaPost